For Underwriting Agencies & MGAs
Mid-sized underwriting firms struggle with a high-cost production floor: manual submission entry and risk data compilation consume junior underwriter and support hours, creating bottlenecks for senior review. We automate the logic-based workflows that standard policy systems miss—recovering capacity that can be redeployed to revenue-generating underwriting work.
Risk-Free Testing: $1,500 is fully refundable if we can't achieve 90%+ accuracy on your real broker submissions and asset schedules—eliminating the risk of software that fails on real-world risk data.
Manual processing at the junior underwriter and support level creates a chain reaction of inefficiency:
Support teams spend hours on document indexing, broker submission filing, and manual policy data entry that should be automated at the source.
Junior underwriters are stuck performing low-level risk data extraction and schedule checking, delaying the files that Seniors need to quote and bind.
By automating logic-heavy tasks like submission data extraction and risk compilation, you free existing staff to handle 20% more GWP without increasing overhead.
The Result: Senior Underwriters receive "Review-Ready" submissions that require risk assessment rather than data correction. Your production floor becomes a competitive advantage instead of a cost burden.
This isn't cash savings—it's recoverable labor capacity you can deploy strategically across four value paths:
Most Valuable Option
Immediate Financial Impact
Operational Excellence
Competitive Positioning
Critical Note: The $700K figure represents recoverable labor capacity, not direct cash savings. Most underwriting firms realize 50-70% of this value through a combination of revenue growth (binding more policies) and cost avoidance (delaying hiring). Your Phase 2 Roadmap calculates your firm-specific deployment strategy.
Generic tools capture text. We automate the judgment calls and internal business rules that normally require manual review by your junior underwriters and technicians.
Automated extraction of risk factors from broker slips and property schedules.
Result: 45 min → 5 min verification
Intelligent data collation from valuation reports, flood maps, and loss history.
Result: Eliminates 50 min of prep per submission
AI-powered indexing and triage of loss adjuster reports and invoices.
Result: Reduces claims admin time by 80%
We provide the reporting and documentation needed to satisfy APRA CPS 234 and binder provider standards.
For Compliance Officers
For Operations Managers
Designed to scale mid-market MGAs by optimizing the production floor.
We provide comprehensive audit preparation reports to satisfy APRA and binder provider standards.
Deployment support for your existing Microsoft Azure, AWS, or Google Cloud stack.
Empowers Junior Underwriters to manage larger submission pipelines; reduces data entry backlogs.
You own the solution. No per-submission fees. No proprietary platform lock-in.
Based on 35+ insurance underwriting firm implementations. Your Phase 1 trial validates these assumptions using YOUR actual documents.
Across 25 Technicians & 10 Admin staff
Recoverable capacity (not cash)
Without adding headcount
When capacity monetized
Conservative assumptions based on 35+ insurance underwriting firm implementations:
Calculation:
Your Firm's Actual Numbers: These are industry benchmarks for a 50-person underwriting firm. Your Phase 1 trial ($1,500) validates these assumptions against YOUR actual documents and workflows, producing YOUR firm-specific ROI model.
Phase 1 tests YOUR documents with YOUR workflows. 90%+ accuracy or full refund.
Book Phase 1 Trial - $1,50048 Hours • $1,500
We test 15 of your most complex slips or schedules. If we don't hit 90% accuracy, you get a full refund.
3 Weeks • $7,500
We map your team workflows and quantify exactly where the production hours are being lost.
2 Weeks • $8-12k
Comprehensive Audit Preparation reports ensuring your AI logic satisfies APRA standards.
30 Days • $20-30k
Deployment to your Azure, AWS, or GCP. You own the code. No per-submission fees.
Critical questions from managing partners about capacity, compliance, and senior impact.
The Protocol is cloud-agnostic and designed for data sovereignty.
We deploy directly into your firm's existing cloud infrastructure, whether you use Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services (AWS), or Google Cloud Platform (GCP). This ensures your risk data never leaves your controlled environment, maintaining strict confidentiality and adhering to APRA prudential requirements for data security.
By using your own cloud, you avoid paying recurring "SaaS taxes" and maintain total control over your automation assets.
We provide the documentation you need for regulatory and binder audits.
During Phase 3 (Compliance Shield), we generate Audit Preparation Reports. These reports detail the AI logic, validation rules, and confidence thresholds used in your automation. This creates a transparent paper trail for APRA reviews or binder provider audits, documenting exactly how risk assessments are supported through accurate data extraction.
Every transaction processed by the system is logged with its original source and logic applied, ensuring full traceability of your firm's underwriting data.
Yes. The system is designed to automate the judgment-heavy logic of underwriting production.
Submission Processing: Extracts asset details, occupancy codes, and sum insured from broker slips. What currently takes 45 minutes for a junior technician reduces to 5 minutes of verification.
Risk Compilation: Collate data from valuation reports and loss history to auto-populate risk summaries. This eliminates up to 80% of the manual preparation time per quote.
Expected result: 85-90% of routine data entry automated. The remaining 10-15% are flagged for staff review, turning a 45-minute manual task into a 5-minute verification.
It's recoverable labor capacity, not cash savings.
The $700K represents the loaded cost of 205 hours per week of manual document processing work (salary + superannuation + overhead). When automated, this capacity becomes available for redeployment.
How underwriting firms typically realize this value:
Your Phase 2 Roadmap creates a firm-specific deployment plan showing exactly how YOU will monetize the recovered capacity.
Yes. Phase 1 specifically tests YOUR asset schedules and broker slips, not generic demo documents.
What we can process:
If we can't achieve 90% accuracy on YOUR specific documents during Phase 1, you receive a full $1,500 refund.
We build a three-layer validation system to prevent costly errors:
Layer 1 - Confidence Scoring: If the AI's confidence is below 95% on critical fields, the transaction is automatically flagged for human review.
Layer 2 - Business Logic Validation: We configure rules specific to your requirements (e.g., "Sum insured must match schedule total"). Mismatches trigger alerts.
Layer 3 - Human Review Queue: Flagged records route to your production staff for quick 15-second verification. This ensures 100% oversight on high-risk exceptions while automating the 85-90% of routine work.
Each phase is a decision gate. You control whether to proceed.
Phase 1 exit: If accuracy targets aren't met, you get a full $1,500 refund. No questions asked.
Phase 2 exit: If the Roadmap shows implementation isn't viable for your specific workflow, you stop there. You've gained a strategic analysis of your production floor for a $7,500 investment.
No long-term contracts. You're not locked into implementation until you've seen proof in Phase 1 and a detailed ROI plan in Phase 2.
Underwriting workflows vary by LOB, binder authority, and cloud infrastructure. Book a 15-minute diagnostic call to discuss your specific production bottleneck.
Book Diagnostic CallPhase 1 proves the concept using YOUR actual broker submissions. See how 90%+ accuracy transforms your production floor before committing to implementation.
$1,500 • 48 hours • Full refund if we don't achieve 90%+ accuracy