Curam-Ai Protocol™

Phase 1 – Feasibility Sprint

Tier One Feasibility Report

Generated: November 2025 | Pilot Client #3

Prepared For: Pilot Client #3
Date: November 2025

Executive Summary

The 50-person structural engineering firm "Pilot Client #3" can unlock $888k in direct savings and $1.44M in new billable capacity by automating three administrative workflows.

Next Step: Validate these figures in Phase 2 – Readiness Roadmap to confirm strategic alignment and ROI.
Prepared For: Pilot Client #3
Date: November 2025

Assumed Variables

Variable Value
Number of Staff50
Current ProcessManual / Email-based
Average Billable Rate$185/hr
Annual Revenue$14,208,000
Compliance StatusUnverified (Requires Phase 3 Audit)

*Baseline assumptions derived from initial discovery call. Used to calculate Tier-1 Efficiency Models.

Prepared For: Pilot Client #3
Date: November 2025

Four-Tier Value Model

Tier Metric Year-1 Value
1 Time SavedAdmin hrs × billable rate$888 k
2 Risk MitigationRework & Liability Avoidance$120k
3 Tender AccelerationBid Volume Increase (+15%)$640k
4 Capacity ReallocationSenior hrs → billable$1.44M

*Figures based on 50 staff. Tier 1: Time valued at Avg. Rate ($185/hr). Tier 4: Capacity valued at Senior Rate (~$300/hr).

Prepared For: Pilot Client #3
Date: November 2025

Roadmap & Phasing

Phase 2 – Readiness Roadmap

3 weeks | $7,500 | Board-Approved Business Case & Implementation Plan

Phase 3 – Compliance Shield

2 weeks | $8–12k | ISO-27001 & PI-insurance alignment

✔ 100% IP Transfer. Source-code and flows owned by client upon final payment. No ongoing licensing.

Prepared For: Pilot Client #3
Date: November 2025

Financial Model (Conservative)

Hours Saved/Week (2 hrs/staff)100
Average billable rate$185/hr
Gross Efficiency Value (48 wks)$888,000
Potential Year-1 Efficiency$888,000

Model built on actual sample data; adoption rate capped at 60%. Implementation costs to be determined in Phase 2.

Prepared For: Pilot Client #3
Date: November 2025

Risk Register (Excerpts)

Recommendation: Address potential risks in Phase 2 to ensure governance compliance.
Prepared For: Pilot Client #3
Date: November 2025

Technical Deep Dive: CAD Schedule

Analysis of Drawing S-105 (Roof Beam Schedule) reveals high structured data extraction but identified specific engineering "traps".

Structured Extraction

100% Accuracy on standard members (B-101, R-02). System correctly grouped "Hot Dip Galv" items for separate procurement workflows.

⚠️

"Human-in-Loop" Trigger

Variable Lengths: Item STR-1 contains "VARIES 1200-2400". AI flagged this as "Non-Procureable" requiring CAD model reference.

Feasibility Verdict: Document S-105 is Passed. The "VARIES" edge case is handled by our Exception Routing workflow, preventing ordering errors.
Prepared For: Pilot Client #3
Date: November 2025

Sprint Validation Log (Technical Annex)

Docs Processed
4
STP Rate
75%
Exceptions
1

Detailed Field Audit (Sample: S-105)

Target Document: CAD Schedule S-105. Extracted using standard structural model.

Field Extracted Value Confidence Status
Mark B-101 99.8% PASS
Profile 460UB82.1 99.2% PASS
Length VARIES 1200-2400 42.0% FLAG
Remarks ...See Detail D5/S-500 88.0% PASS
👷 Engineer's Note:

The system correctly identified that item STR-1 had a variable length range and stopped the automation. This "Safety Flag" prevents invalid orders from reaching the fabricator.

Full Artifact List

Prepared For: Pilot Client #3
Date: November 2025

Recommendation to Proceed

Based on the $888k efficiency potential identified in the Executive Summary and the Technical Validation of your specific documents, we recommend proceeding to Phase 2 immediately.

Phase 2: Readiness Roadmap Investment: $7,500

Approved By (Pilot Client #3)

Date